Everything Totally Explained


Ask & we'll explain, totally!
Polypersonal agreement
Totally Explained


  NEW! All the latest news in the worlds of computer gaming, entertainment, the environment,  
finance, health, politics, science, stocks & shares, technology and much, much, more.  


View this entry using RSS

Everything about Polypersonal Agreement totally explained

In linguistics, polypersonal agreement or polypersonalism is the agreement of a verb with more than one of its arguments (usually up to four). Polypersonalism is a morphological feature of a language, and languages that display it are called polypersonal languages. In non-polypersonal languages, the verb either shows no agreement at all or agrees with the primary argument (in English, the subject). In a language with polypersonal agreement, the verb has agreement morphemes that may indicate (as applicable) the subject, the direct object, the indirect or secondary object, the beneficiary of the verb action, etc. This polypersonal marking may be compulsory or optional (the latter meaning that some agreement morphemes can be elided if the full argument is expressed). Polysynthesis often includes polypersonalism, which in turn is a form of head-marking. Polypersonalism has also been correlated with ergativity.
   Examples of languages with polypersonal agreement are Basque and Georgian, as well as most polysynthetic languages, like Mohawk, Inuktitut and many other Native American languages.

Examples

Georgian

In Georgian, the verb consists of a root and several optional affixes. The subject and object markers might appear as suffixes or prefixes, according to the verb class, the person and number, the tense and aspect of the verb, etc.; they also interact with each other phonologically. The polypersonal verbal system of Georgian allows the verb compound to convey the meanings of subject, direct object, indirect object, genitive, locative and causative meanings. As examples of the extremely complicated Georgian verb morphology, these are some simple polypersonal verbs (hyphens indicate morpheme boundaries):
» v-khed-av "I see him"


   g-mal-av-en "they hide you (sing. or pl.)" » g-i-mal-av-en "they hide it from you (sing. or pl.)"


   gv-i-ket-eb-s "he is doing it for us" » a-chuk-eb-s "he will give it to him (as a gift)"


   mi-u-lots-av-s "he will congratulate him on it" Reference: THE GEORGIAN LANGUAGE - An outline grammatical summary.
   An example of a polypersonal verb that has the genitive meaning incorporated can be:
» xelebi ga-m-i-tsiv-d-a "My hands got cold"

Here, xelebi means "hands." The second morpheme in the verb (-m-) conveys the meaning "my." In Georgian this construction is very common with intransitive verbs; the possessive adjective (my, your, etc.) is omitted before the subject, and the verb takes up the genitive meaning.

Biblical Hebrew

In Biblical Hebrew, or in poetic forms of Hebrew, a pronominal direct object can be incorporated into a verb's conjugation rather than included as a separate word. For example, ahavtikha, with the suffix -kha indicating a masculine, singular, second-person direct object, is a poetic way to say ahavti otkha ("I love you"). This also changes the position of the stress; while ahavti puts the stress on hav (/a 'hav ti/), ahavtikha puts it on ti (/a hav 'ti xa/). The same is true also of Classical Arabic and Akkadian, while some Egyptian Arabic dialects are polysynthetic.

Clitic pronouns

Polypersonalism involves bound morphemes that are part of the verbal morphology and therefore can't be found separated from the verb. These morphemes are not to be confused with pronominal clitics, like English 'em or the Spanish object clitics lo, le, etc. While in Spanish it's quite possible to express meanings like "giving it to him/her" or "show them to me" in one word (dándoselo, muéstramelos), the pronominal morphemes indicating the direct and indirect objects (se, lo, me, los) are not part of the verb.
   Some have observed that the French pronominal clitics (common to all Romance languages) have evolved into inseparable parts of the verb in the colloquial use, and so, suggested that French could be analyzed as polypersonal. But these morphemes could simply be seen as inseparable clitic nouns.

Further Information

Get more info on 'Polypersonal Agreement'.


External Link Exchanges

Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:

    <a href="http://polypersonal_agreement.totallyexplained.com">Polypersonal agreement Totally Explained</a>

Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
   As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned.



Copyright © 2007-8 totallyexplained.com | Licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License | Site Map
This article contains text from the Wikipedia article Polypersonal agreement (History) and is released under the GFDL | RSS Version